PEMILIHAN DAN MATC 2010

Parti akan mengadakan pemilihan pimpinan di peringkat Cabang dan Majlis Pimpinan Pusat (MPP) pada tahun 2010 ini (Pemilihan 2010).

Proses pemilihan kali ini akan berdasarkan perlembagaan KEADILAN yang telah dipinda dan diluluskan di dalam Kongres Nasional Khas 2009 serta oleh pihak Pendaftar Pertubuhan pada 28 April 2010.

Pindaan perlembagaan KEADILAN ini menterjemahkan hasrat Parti untuk menjadi sebuah badan parti politik yang lebih demokratik dan diwakili oleh suara ramai anggota-anggota Parti dalam proses pemilihan pimpinannya.

Seperti mana lazimnya dan menurut kehendak perlembagaan Parti, pemilihan pimpinan Cabang akan diadakan dalam Mesyuarat Agung Tahunan Cabang (MATC) tahun 2010. Pemilihan pimpinan MPP pula adalah menerusi suatu sesi undian khas yang akan melibatkan keanggotaan Parti secara langsung.

Berikut adalah jadual bagi Pemilihan 2010 bagi Cabang-Cabang di Negeri Pahang.

Klik di gambar untuk besarkan.

Stop The Fabrications And Lies

by Din Merican on Wednesday, August 11, 2010 at 9:42pm
Attorney-General, IGP & MACC Chief:Stop The Fabrications and Lies
People have asked me why I don't seem to write about Sodomy II. They are curious if I have abandoned Anwar Ibrahim's cause or struggle. They are curious if I know something about Anwar that I don't seem to want to write in his defence, or report about his on-going trial. Yes, I do know a lot of things about Anwar, most important of which is that he is not guilty of the charge they have framed against him, whether in Sodomy I or Sodomy II. I know a lot of things about Anwar to know that Sodomy II is as evil as Sodomy I.
Sodomy 2 is a lost cause
So, why don't I write about Anwar's trial? Because, it is a lost cause! Because the BN government is galvanizing all its powers to
fix Anwar and they will convict him by hook or by crook. In Sodomy I, the combination of the government's might was used - the Police, the Attorney-General and the Courts. The same base tactic is being used again in Sodomy II, nothing creative nothing ingenuous. So there is nothing more to write there. I have become "Lelah" (the closest English word I can think of is "exasperated"), knowing that Sodomy II will end like Sodomy I. If such a thing can happen to a former Deputy Prime Minister, what hope is there for Rule of Law, for Truth and Justice to prevail?
Never Give Up Hope
But I am being reminded by concerned Malaysians that we cannot give up hope. For the sake of our future generations, we must believe that change is possible. We must believe that the struggle must not end with just the fight for Justice for Anwar. We now have the opportunity to send a strong message to this BN government that it must change, or it will be changed. We can direct the mind of the masses to recognize the fabrications and lies in the case of Kugan, Teoh Beng Hock, Altantuya Shariibu, Dato' Ramli Yusuff and Lawyer Rosli Dahlan.
We can galvanise public view so that the perpetrators are identified and be remembered so that they cannot hoodwink us to believe otherwise. It used to be said that history is written by the victors. But in this cyberworld, the pens of the individual observers can reach out to the hearts and mind of the masses. We can overcome the lies of the mainstream media which are nothing more than propaganda tools of the government.
Teoh Beng Hock's Suicide Note: The Mother of All Fabrications
While the family is still mourning Teoh Beng Hock's death. While Malaysians are still infuriated by the death of a young man whom the MACC has admitted was needed just as a witness. While the facts show Teoh was thrown out of the 14th Floor office of the MACC Shah Alam office, the MACC is conniving at a cover up. It is incredulous that on the day of the incident, the Selangor MACC Director should see it fit to run and seek directions from Dato' Abu Kassim in Putrajaya instead of attending to Teoh's death. That Abu Kassim would have then directed a denial to be issued, shows his complicity in this cover up. It is unbelievable that the whole machinery of the MACC, the Police and the AG's office are then seen working in unison towards this cover up.
Still, the public was willing to give the MACC a chance to explain what happened through the Coroner's Enquiry. But now, at this late stage, it is just unbelievable that AG Gani is showing contempt to all Malaysians by contriving a "suicide note". This is an affront to Malaysian sensibilities. This is insulting Malaysian intelligence. This is just too revolting.
Already, Attorney General Gani Patail has been embroiled in numerous allegations of fabrications and lies. Lawyer Manjit Singh Dhillon had previously accused Gani Patail of fabrication in Nallakaruppan's firearm's case. Dato' Mat Zin, former KL Police OCCI, had also accused Gani Patail and Musa Hassan of fabricating evidence in Anwar's black eye case. These two man are just too tainted. And yet Gani Patail now wants Malaysians to believe the existence of a suicide note? I will not bother commenting any further than to just quote what my good friend and Member of Parliament Gobin Singh Deo has said to Gani Patail: " I say it again, resign. Take the blame, do it honourably. If this can happen wit Teoh's case, what about other cases and prosecutions?"
Indeed, what about other cases? While in Teoh's case, they fabricated a suicide note, what did they do in the Altantuya murder case? Did they not make the Immigration records disappear? Did they not do that after they made Altantuya herself disappear? Or more like blown her to bits. Yes, they C4'd her and then erased the Immigration records of her entry. Yes that's what they did - fabricate and lie. Two policemen were convicted while Abdul Razak Baginda was acquitted. AG Gani did not appeal although the two policemen could not have done it on their own. AG Gani did not appeal and Razak Baginda made a quick exit out of the country.
In the Sabah case against Dato' Ramli, the MACC officer , Sok One a/l Essen lodged a false report by naming Dato' Ramli in a report. Sok One said that he received a telephone call and wrote on a piece of paper of what he heard about Dato' Ramli from this penghulu kampong . Under cross examination in Court, the Penghulu denied that he ever mentioned Ramli's name. Sok One has since admitted in Court that he had destroyed the paper on which the information was written. In effect, this MACC officer had admitted that he destroyed evidence. Judge Supang Lian acquitted Dato' Ramli in that case. AG Gani appealed and lost in the High Court. Yet, AG Gani is still appealing further to the Court of Appeal!
In Dato' Ramli's earlier KL case, the MACC IO Azmi Ismail admitted that his report against Dato' Ramli for being involved in corruption was not of his own knowledge or investigation but purely based on another report. That led to the startling discovery of several other cover reports No. 098/2006 to R/No: 075/2006 to R/No. 072/2006 to R/No: 065/2006 which all turned out to be fabrications as Dato' Ramli's name was not mentioned in any of it. That was why I wrote about Kevin Morais: The Liar Who Got Buried In His Lies. Judge M. Gunalen also acquitted Dato' Ramli without calling for his defence. AG Gani is also appealing. AG Gani did not see it fit to appeal against Razak Baginda's acquittal in a murder case, but sees it fit to appeal against Dato' Ramli in a fix-up misdeclaration of assets case. From this, you can AG Gani's priorities!
Recent Persecution of Dato' Ramli Yusuff
Then in the present Summons case against Dato' Ramli before Judge SM Komathy, the IO Wan Abdul Rahman admitted he knew there was an unsigned letter of approval from then IGP Tan Sri Bakri for Dato' Ramli to form a company and to be its shareholder and director. He did not ask where is the signed copy of that letter. He did not interview Tan Sri Bakri to confirm that Tan Sri Bakri had indeed given his approval. He did not interview Dato' Robiah to confirm that there was indeed approval and a signed letter.
MACC IO Wan Abdul Rahman did not ask how is it that the signed letter of approval from Tan Sri Bakri disappeared from Dato Ramli's service record kept with the PDRM's Pentadbiran when Musa Hassan became IGP in September 2006. Did Musa Hassan have anything to do with the disappearance of that signed letter? After all Musa Hassan is the famous mattress carrier in Sodomy I!
What is so clear here is that IGP Musa Hassan, MACC Chief Abu Kassim and AG Gani Patail are involved in fabrications and lies. Evidence can disappear and appear like David Copperfield's magic show. Witnesses can die while under their watch. What is so clear is that Malaysians can no longer trust the highest law enforcement officers of this country. It is time we say to the Home Minister Dato' Hishammuddin Hussein Onn- on the grave of your father , do the honorable thing. Don't you dare extend Musa Hassan's contract.
It is time we say to the faces of Gani Patail, Musa Hassan and Abu Kassim – Stop these lies and fabrications. It is time we say to them –Resign Now!


How did Umno get hold of such a document which is still with the AG? Anwar Ibrahim has no access to important documents even the police report, witness list and medical reports, but Umno members get them so easily.

HIMPUNAN ORANG ASAL PKR PAhaNG ZON TENGAH

Himpunan Orang Asal Zon Tengag PKR Pahang akan diadakan pada 7hb Ogos 2010 di Sekolah Al-Mukmin, Temerloh pada 7hb Ogos 2010 dan akan dirasmikan oleh YBhg Dato Seri Wan Azizah, Presiden KEADILAN jam 10.00 pagi.

Seramai 200 orang peserta terdiri daripada Orang Asal Kuala Krau, Jerantut, Temerloh dan Bera akan menghadiri Himpunan sehari suntuk itu.

3 kertas kerja akan dibentangkan iaitu oleh Bob Manolan Mohamad, AJK AMK PKR Pusat, Yusri Ahon dan Tijah Yok Chopil.

Majlis penutup akan dirasmikan oleh YBhg Dato Fauzi Abdul Rahman pada jam 6.00 petang.

Pada sebelah malamnya akan diadakan ceramah umum dan penceramah-penceramahnya terdiri daripada Dato Fauzi Abdul Rahman, YB Gobalakrishnan, CheguBard, Yb Elizabeth Wong, dan Tijah Yok Chopil di rumah Hj Suhaimi Said, Kg Batu 4, Jln Maran, Temerloh, Pahang.

Lack of integrity at the very top

M. Bakri Musa

Last week I wrote, “So we have two disturbing displays of less than exemplary behaviors if not outright lack of professionalism at the highest levels of our civil service. One is the Chief Secretary not hearing both sides to the Lim Eng Guan and Nik Ali squabble before rendering judgment, and the other, the Solicitor General failing to recognize a breach of professional ethics.”

I penned that piece too soon. For a few days later we have yet a third example from another top civil servant, this time Attorney General (AG) Gani Patail. Responding to the allegation of improper behavior by one of his prosecutors in the Sodomy II trial, Gani Patail simply reassigned her.

Living ten thousand miles away I have little to do with the Malaysian civil service. My daily life is thus not affected by these tiada maruah (lack of integrity) folks at the top. The organization however, is essentially Malay; likewise the political establishment. These top civil servants and political leaders are thus seen as representing the best of not just their organizations but also of Malays. Consequently, their shortcomings are viewed less as personal failures but more of our community. When they behave tiada maruah, collectively Malays are also seen as such. That is what makes me angry.

Essence of the Exposé

The AG justified his action “to remove any negative public perception of the prosecuting team.” He did not address the substance of the allegation; he managed only the perception and ignored the reality.

Raja Petra Kamarudin (RPK) first made the explosive allegation in Malaysia Today (mt.m2day.net). In a headline-blaring column titled, “The Bizarre Case of Sodomy 2,” RPK in his trademark style named the specific prosecutor, and rightly characterized the indiscretion as “a conflict of interest of the first degree.”

The allegation appeared at the end of a long article, and seemed more as an afterthought. You have to read his entire piece to get to the stunning revelation. Those who gave up earlier would miss it. It was as if RPK was challenging his readers to be thorough and not be content with only the headlines and few introductory paragraphs.

There was also a teasing coyness to the exposé; it was uncharacteristically brief. Beyond the mention of the name, there were no other details. It was as if RPK was laying a trap. Throw a teaser out, and then see those bastards falling all over themselves condemning him.

This time however, there was silence. There were no hysterical accusations or righteous condemnations that RPK was purveying “half-truths,” or as one novice politician would put it, “only 40 percent facts and the rest made up.”

My gut feeling is that RPK reveals way less than 40 percent of what he knows or has information on this evolving scandal. I had hoped that those UMNO jackasses would have resorted to their usual mouth-frothing denunciations of RPK. Then I could see him salivating like a lion that had successfully lured its prey to a trap where it could be pounced upon mercilessly.

Alas, no one walked into the trap. So we have to be patient with RPK or hope that someone would aggravate him enough for him to reveal the sordid details, perhaps titillating snippets of the videotape of the amorous illicit encounter!

The Larger Issue

It took less than a week for Gani Patail to respond to RPK’s revelation; unusually ‘efficient.’ This promptness, while laudatory, did not excuse his avoiding the heart of the matter – the truth to the allegation. For if the allegation were other than the “only 40 percent facts,” then the AG would have perpetrated a grave injustice on the young lawyer. Far from reassigning her, she should have been publicly exonerated, her integrity openly defended.

At the very least she should have been accorded due process. Even an accused murderer deserves that! The AG should be the last person to have to be reminded of this elementary legal tenet. Here we have the obscenity of the AG having a press conference first, with the poor prosecutor learning of her fate not from the media. Simple decency demanded that the AG should have met with the alleged wayward lawyer first, to get her side of the story and then to inform her of his decision.

If the allegation were true, then the AG has more than a serious disciplinary problem. There are the legal issues with respect to the Sodomy 2 trial. Additionally, the alleged act was also criminal per the Sharia.

Gani Patail cannot abrogate his responsibility. It is not enough for him to simply declare, “… [A]ny personal matter, if it can have any implication in whatever form on the department, will be handled very seriously.” He also has to demonstrate it.

If the allegation has substance, then the AG must remind himself that if she is not disciplined now, she would continue winding her up the civil service. She could one day be a judge or even the AG.

I am not concerned here with the career trajectory of a young lawyer. Nor am I particularly perturbed at the ineptness of some of our high level officials. I have seen enough similar examples elsewhere to be able to put that in perspective. The Peter Principle is after all universal.

I am however concerned with the pattern of tiada maruah leadership in the civil service and other essentially Malay entities. The recent scandal at Sime Darby reflects the pervasiveness of this blight. Again this being Malaysia, the racial element is never far from the public radar. One only has to read the bigoted comments on the Internet and elsewhere to be painfully reminded of this.

These tiada maruah Malays only feed this ugly stereotype. Of all people I would have expected them to be conscious of this, and thus make every effort to ensure that their behaviors would help tear down this unfair image.

I am not in the least comforted by the fact the Indian civil service is even more bloated and lumbering, or that the folks in Beijing are hideously more corrupt (note the recent scandal of tainted baby formulas) and disrespectful of basic human rights (witness their all too frequent summary executions). We are talking about Malaysia here, with our own rules, norms and expectations.

The other communities too have their own peculiar blights. The scandals with MAIKA and Port Klang Free Zone Project are obscene reminders of that. To me that is neither an excuse nor a consolation.

I feel for those honest, competent and diligent public servants who are Malays. They give all they have for the nation but their good work is being overshadowed by these yahoos at the top. How did the likes of Gani Patail reach the top? Likewise, I keep wondering how such unimaginative, frankly corrupt, and not terribly competent people get to lead us. More importantly, why did we let them? The answers elude me.

We can only change the negative image of our community by changing the reality. Vote these corrupt and incompetent bastards out! Voting them in again would only encourage them. Indeed this is exactly what has been happening. By repeatedly voting them in for the past 50 years, we are implicitly condoning if not encouraging their wayward ways.

Once we have capable political leaders, they will take care of the Napoleons in the public service, the little as well as the big ones. In the meantime we must do everything we can to shame them. This essay is an exercise in that. Come the election, we can punish them.

Those who love our community and champion its cause, including the Ketuanan Melayu folks, would do well to enlist in this urgent and critical mission of ridding our community of these tiada maruah leaders and civil servants.

Unless we destroy the blight now, it will be the undoing of our society. This is where we should focus. We must not be distracted by such imagined enemies as the pendatangs (immigrants), capitalism, or globalization. The enemy is us, specifically our leaders.

Tiada Maruah or Lack of Integrity At The Very Top

M. Bakri Musa

Last week I wrote, “So we have two disturbing displays of less than exemplary behaviors if not outright lack of professionalism at the highest levels of our civil service. One is the Chief Secretary not hearing both sides to the Lim Eng Guan and Nik Ali squabble before rendering judgment, and the other, the Solicitor General failing to recognize a breach of professional ethics.”

I penned that piece too soon. For a few days later we have yet a third example from another top civil servant, this time Attorney General (AG) Gani Patail. Responding to the allegation of improper behavior by one of his prosecutors in the Sodomy II trial, Gani Patail simply reassigned her.

Living ten thousand miles away I have little to do with the Malaysian civil service. My daily life is thus not affected by these tiada maruah (lack of integrity) folks at the top. The organization however, is essentially Malay; likewise the political establishment. These top civil servants and political leaders are thus seen as representing the best of not just their organizations but also of Malays. Consequently, their shortcomings are viewed less as personal failures but more of our community. When they behave tiada maruah, collectively Malays are also seen as such. That is what makes me angry.

Essence of the Exposé

The AG justified his action “to remove any negative public perception of the prosecuting team.” He did not address the substance of the allegation; he managed only the perception and ignored the reality.

Raja Petra Kamarudin (RPK) first made the explosive allegation in Malaysia Today (mt.m2day.net). In a headline-blaring column titled, “The Bizarre Case of Sodomy 2,” RPK in his trademark style named the specific prosecutor, and rightly characterized the indiscretion as “a conflict of interest of the first degree.”

The allegation appeared at the end of a long article, and seemed more as an afterthought. You have to read his entire piece to get to the stunning revelation. Those who gave up earlier would miss it. It was as if RPK was challenging his readers to be thorough and not be content with only the headlines and few introductory paragraphs.

There was also a teasing coyness to the exposé; it was uncharacteristically brief. Beyond the mention of the name, there were no other details. It was as if RPK was laying a trap. Throw a teaser out, and then see those bastards falling all over themselves condemning him.

This time however, there was silence. There were no hysterical accusations or righteous condemnations that RPK was purveying “half-truths,” or as one novice politician would put it, “only 40 percent facts and the rest made up.”

My gut feeling is that RPK reveals way less than 40 percent of what he knows or has information on this evolving scandal. I had hoped that those UMNO jackasses would have resorted to their usual mouth-frothing denunciations of RPK. Then I could see him salivating like a lion that had successfully lured its prey to a trap where it could be pounced upon mercilessly.

Alas, no one walked into the trap. So we have to be patient with RPK or hope that someone would aggravate him enough for him to reveal the sordid details, perhaps titillating snippets of the videotape of the amorous illicit encounter!

The Larger Issue

It took less than a week for Gani Patail to respond to RPK’s revelation; unusually ‘efficient.’ This promptness, while laudatory, did not excuse his avoiding the heart of the matter – the truth to the allegation. For if the allegation were other than the “only 40 percent facts,” then the AG would have perpetrated a grave injustice on the young lawyer. Far from reassigning her, she should have been publicly exonerated, her integrity openly defended.

At the very least she should have been accorded due process. Even an accused murderer deserves that! The AG should be the last person to have to be reminded of this elementary legal tenet. Here we have the obscenity of the AG having a press conference first, with the poor prosecutor learning of her fate not from the media. Simple decency demanded that the AG should have met with the alleged wayward lawyer first, to get her side of the story and then to inform her of his decision.

If the allegation were true, then the AG has more than a serious disciplinary problem. There are the legal issues with respect to the Sodomy 2 trial. Additionally, the alleged act was also criminal per the Sharia.

Gani Patail cannot abrogate his responsibility. It is not enough for him to simply declare, “… [A]ny personal matter, if it can have any implication in whatever form on the department, will be handled very seriously.” He also has to demonstrate it.

If the allegation has substance, then the AG must remind himself that if she is not disciplined now, she would continue winding her up the civil service. She could one day be a judge or even the AG.

I am not concerned here with the career trajectory of a young lawyer. Nor am I particularly perturbed at the ineptness of some of our high level officials. I have seen enough similar examples elsewhere to be able to put that in perspective. The Peter Principle is after all universal.

I am however concerned with the pattern of tiada maruah leadership in the civil service and other essentially Malay entities. The recent scandal at Sime Darby reflects the pervasiveness of this blight. Again this being Malaysia, the racial element is never far from the public radar. One only has to read the bigoted comments on the Internet and elsewhere to be painfully reminded of this.

These tiada maruah Malays only feed this ugly stereotype. Of all people I would have expected them to be conscious of this, and thus make every effort to ensure that their behaviors would help tear down this unfair image.

I am not in the least comforted by the fact the Indian civil service is even more bloated and lumbering, or that the folks in Beijing are hideously more corrupt (note the recent scandal of tainted baby formulas) and disrespectful of basic human rights (witness their all too frequent summary executions). We are talking about Malaysia here, with our own rules, norms and expectations.

The other communities too have their own peculiar blights. The scandals with MAIKA and Port Klang Free Zone Project are obscene reminders of that. To me that is neither an excuse nor a consolation.

I feel for those honest, competent and diligent public servants who are Malays. They give all they have for the nation but their good work is being overshadowed by these yahoos at the top. How did the likes of Gani Patail reach the top? Likewise, I keep wondering how such unimaginative, frankly corrupt, and not terribly competent people get to lead us. More importantly, why did we let them? The answers elude me.

We can only change the negative image of our community by changing the reality. Vote these corrupt and incompetent bastards out! Voting them in again would only encourage them. Indeed this is exactly what has been happening. By repeatedly voting them in for the past 50 years, we are implicitly condoning if not encouraging their wayward ways.

Once we have capable political leaders, they will take care of the Napoleons in the public service, the little as well as the big ones. In the meantime we must do everything we can to shame them. This essay is an exercise in that. Come the election, we can punish them.

Those who love our community and champion its cause, including the Ketuanan Melayu folks, would do well to enlist in this urgent and critical mission of ridding our community of these tiada maruah leaders and civil servants.

Unless we destroy the blight now, it will be the undoing of our society. This is where we should focus. We must not be distracted by such imagined enemies as the pendatangs (immigrants), capitalism, or globalization. The enemy is us, specifically our leaders.

A Dishonourable Man – ZAHRAIN HASHIM

Zahrain Hashim - Voted MP for Bayan Baru under PKR banner in 2008. Quit PKR in 2010 to become UMNO-friendly when his RM2.00 company didn't get contract to manage BJGCC.

Dear Bayan Baru MP Zahrain Hashim,

It has come to my notice that you have again provided the press with information pertaining to matters you actually have no knowledge of but are instead pretending to.

It seems to me that you are still so desperately trying to earn brownie points with your new masters that you have instead resorted to a pathetic and tenuous attempt to discredit my integrity based on nothing more than a feeble threat of being possessed of documentary proof of my wrongdoings, which I know for a fact you could not possibly have.

In the event you are unable to decipher the innuendo in that statement, then let me leave you in no doubt that apart from my observations of your dishonourable conduct as a parliamentarian, I am now calling you a blatant liar.

The only proof you could possibly have of any sponsorship of my expenses in London would be copies of my American Express and Visa card bills. If you do indeed have copies of these statements, then you will no doubt have realised that whatever it cost to fly to London from Australia, stay in a hotel there for seven nights and then return to Australia, was paid for out of my own hard-earned money and no one else's.

I understand this concept may be alien to a politician of your stature but please try and understand that ordinary people sometimes do pay their own bills.

So I am now going to detail those expenses for you, Zahrain. As I have said, I have bills to back these expenses and I have proof that I paid for them myself.

1. Qantas airfares for my wife and I from Perth to London return - AUD$12,560.24 (American Express)

2. Chesterfield Hotel, Charles St, Mayfair, London - Pounds Sterling 1,550 (Visa)

I also know for a fact that both Manjeet Singh Dhillon and Amarjit Singh Sidhu paid for their respective trips to London themselves but I do not have exact details of those expenses. Since you have not leveled any accusations against them as yet I will leave it at that.

You may question why we paid all this money out of our own pockets. You may also choose to question why the legal services we are providing P Balasubramaniam are pro bono. The answer is very simple and probably beyond your comprehension. We consider it part of our duty to the nation.

Bala travelled to London on a plane ticket he purchased himself in India from the funds he received from Deepak Jaikishan. He checked into a deluxe room in a 4-star hotel in Notting Hill Gate as required by the MACC (Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission). They had promised to reimburse him for his flight and accommodation. I have documents to prove this. Please also remember that the MACC pulled out of this deal at the very last moment as Bala was in mid flight.

We were forced to hold a roundtable discussion at the Lagenda restaurant Holliday Villa Hotel, London, after the press conference on July 7 because Bala informed us he did not have enough money to pay his hotel bill. He had assumed the MACC would be picking up the tab.

I must confess I was greatly impressed with the speed at which all those at the table pitched in. RPK was the first person to hand over 500 pounds from his own pocket whilst other persons present passed the hat around and in no time at all, Bala was in funds again.

Needless to say, the two Special Branch agents seconded to eavesdrop were no where to be seen when that hat was passed around. Donations were received from ordinary Malaysians who were there supporting the fight of good over evil and truth over deceit. A big heartfelt 'syabas' to them all. Your nation is proud of you!

Now Zahrain, if you have proof to contradict my claim that my expenses in particular were borne by no other person than myself, please be man enough to reveal it. May I suggest that you ask Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz for those documents back. I am sure he would be only too happy to assist you in discrediting me.

Zahrain, be very clear that the reason why I called you a dishonourable man was for cheating those people who placed their trust in you by voting for you in the last elections. In the real world this would have meant that your credibility would have been irreparably destroyed. Not however, in the political world in which you now live, where chicanery of this nature is par for the course and is encouraged by reward.

Finally, Zahrain, even if PKR had sponsored my trip, (which unfortunately they have not), I am unable to comprehend why you would have considered this such a serious offence as to necessitate indignant press releases.

I would have thought support of this nature would have been lauded by any right thinking member of society as it would have shown a commitment by the opposition in ensuring that perpetrators of misdeeds are brought to justice, a concept you still appear not to appreciate very well.

So I have thrown down the gauntlet Zahrain. Produce your proof or forever hold your loquacity.

Let it be known that I am not intimidated by your threats. Paper tigers do not frighten me.

The writer is lawyer for private investigator P Balasubramaniam.

KENYATAAN MEDIA

PARTI KEADILAN RAKRAT

NEGERI PAHANG

29 JULAI 2010

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SAMAN EKOR : MEMBEBANKAN RAKYAT

KEPUTUSAN KERAJAAN YANG MENGUATKUASAKAN SAMAN EKOR OLEH PIHAK BERKUASA POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA DILIHAT SANGAT MEMBEBANKAN RAKYAT TERUTAMA YANG BERPENDAPATAN RENDAH. SAMAN TERSEBUT MELIBATKAN BEBERAPA KESALAHAN JALANRAYA TERUTAMA MEMANDU MELEBIHI HAD LAJU YANG DITETAPKAN. KEPUTUSAN KERAJAAN YANG MENETAPKAN SEMUA SAMAN EKOR MESTI DIJELASKAN SEPENUHNYA WALAUPUN ADA YANG TELAH MELEBIHI LIMA TAHUN MENYEBABKAN RAKYAT DIBEBANI. ADA DI ANTARA MEREKA YANG MEMPUNYAI LEBIH DARIPADA LIMA SAMAN YANG BERMAKSUD MEREKA PERLU MEMBAYAR SEHINGGA rm1500.00 (rm300.00 BAGI SETIAP SAMAN). KERAJAAN JUGA MENETAPKAN AGAR PENGGUNA JALANRAYA MENJELASKAN SEPENUHNYA SEMUA SAMAN SEBELUM MEREKA DIBENARKAN MEMPERBAHARUI LESEN MEMANDU DAN CUKAI JALAN.

KEADILAN PAHANG MERASA AMAT KESAL DENGAN KEPUTUSAN KERAJAAN INI DI ATAS BEBERAPA SEBAB :

1. SEBAHAGIAN BESAR DARIPADA RAKYAT MALAYSIA ADALAH MEREKA YANG BERPENDAPATAN SEDERHANA DAN RENDAH. OLEH YANG DEMIKIAN PENGUATKUASAAN INI AMAT MEMBEBANKAN MEREKA.

2. BEBANAN HIDUP YANG SEMAKIN MENINGKAT AKIBAT KENAIKAN HARGA BARANGAN PENGGUNA TELAH MENYEBABKAN BERLAKU KEMEROSOTAN DI DALAM NILAI PENDAPATAN MEREKA MENYEBABKAN RAKYAT TIDAK MEMPUNYAI SIMPANAN YANG MENCUKUPI. OLEH ITU PENGUATKUASAAN PEMBAYARAN SAMAN EKOR INI AKAN MENAMBAHKAN BEBAN KEPADA RAKYAT MARHAEN.

3. PERTAMBAHAN (ANJAKAN) PENDAPATAN DAN GAJI DI KALANGAN RAKYAT AMAT PERLAHAN DI MALAYSIA BERBANDING DENGAN NEGARA-NEGARA MAJU DAN MEMBANGUN YANG LAIN MENYEBABKAN RAKYAT SENTIASA DIHIMPIT DENGAN BEBAN KEWANGAN. SEBAGAI CONTOH DARI TAHUN 1973 HINGGA 2010 PENDAPATAN/GAJI PEKERJA DI MALAYSIA MENINGKAT DI ANTARA 0 – 1.5 KALI GANDA BERBANDING DENGAN KENAIKAN HARGA BARANG KEPERLUAN SEPERTI BARANG MAKANAN, KENDERAAN DAN RUMAH YANG MELONJAK DI ANTARA 6 – 10 KALI GANDA.

4. KEGAWATAN EKONOMI YANG MELANDA NEGARA TURUT MENYEBABKAN RAKYAT MENANGGUNG BEBAN KEHIDUPAN YANG SEMAKIN SUKAR. OLEH ITU PENGUATKUASAAN PEMBAYARAN SAMAN EKOR INI AKAN MENAMBAHKAN LAGI BEBAN KEHIDUPAN MEREKA.

DI ATAS FAKTOR-FAKTOR INILAH KEADILAN PAHANG MENYERU PIHAK KERAJAAN:

1. MENGHAPUSKAN SAMAN EKOR DAN MENGGANTIKANNYA DENGAN SAMAN BERTULIS DENGAN PIHAK POLIS TRAFIK MELAKSANAKAN SEKATAN JALANRAYA.

2. MEMPERHEBATKAN PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN KESELAMATAN JALANRAYA.

3. MEMANSUHKAN SEMUA SAMAN EKOR YANG TELAH DIKELUARKAN DEMI MERINGANKAN BEBAN RAKYAT SEJAJAR DENGAN SLOGAN RAKYAT DIDAHULUKAN.

KEADILAN PAHANG SEKALI LAGI MENEGASKAN BAHAWA SAMAN EKOR YANG DIKENAKAN INI AMAT MEMBEBANKAN RAKYAT TERUTAMA MEREKA YANG BERPENDAPATAN RANDAH DAN SEDERHANA. OLEH ITU KERAJAAN DIMINTA UNTUK MEMPERTIMBANGKAN SEMULA PENGUATKUASAANNYA DAN MENGHAPUSKAN SEMUA SAMAN TERSEBUT YANG TELAH DIKELUARKAN.

TERIMA KASIH.

KEADILAN UNTUK SEMUA

PARTI KEADILAN RAKYAT NEGERI PAHANG

DATO’ FAUZI ABDUL RAHMAN

PENGERUSI

MAJLIS PIMPINAN NEGERI

MALAYSIA : DIMANAKAH KITA PADA TAHUN 2020..???

MALAYSIA: DI MANAKAH KITA PADA TAHUN 2020……?

(Jika anda mepunyai anak, bacalah sehingga akhir…).

Ke manakah arah tuju kita untuk generasi akan datang…?

Bagi yang mula bekerja pada 1973, kereta Jepun 1.3 liter berharga RM7,000. Hari ini harganya adalah sekitar RM60,000..kenaikkan 8.5 kali ganda.

Pada tahun 1973, rumah dua tingkat adalah kira-kira RM45,000….atau kurang. Hari ini harganya adalah sekitar RM300,000…meningkat sebanyak 6.6 kali ganda.

Pada tahun 1973, gaji seorang jurutera adalah RM1,000. Hari ini sekitar RM2,000, naik 2 kali ganda.

Dari tahun 1973 sehingga 2008……35 tahun……apakah coraknya?..”Bearish”!!! (kenaikan harga barangan pengguna termasuk barang-barang keperluan utama seperti rumah dan kereta yang melambung tidak sejajar dengan kenaikan gaji/pendapatan).

Sekiranya corak pasaran saham adalah bersifat demikian, apakah yang akan kita lakukan?...Keluar dari pasaran!!!

Apabila corak ekonomi negara adalah sedemikian, apakah akan kita lakukan ?

Corak sebegini adalah lebih sukar dipulihkan berbanding dengan pasaran saham.

Saya telah menggunakan 3 perkara ini : Rumah, Kereta & Gaji untuk mengukur pencapaian negara selama 35 tahun…..Orang asing juga bertanyakan 3 perkara ini untuk mengukur tahap dan taraf kehidupan kita.

Sebuah buku yang saya baca berjudul : “Malaysia : The Failed Nation“. Mungkin ada di antara anda yang berminat untuk membacanya. Saya bersetuju dengan penulisnya….

Pagi ini saya minum kopi di McDonald (sekarang kopinya…100% biji kopi Arabica…sedap juga rasanya @ RM 2.90….boleh tambah secara percuma!!

Saya bertanyakan berapakah gaji pekerja mereka sejam? RM3.00 x 8 jam = RM24 sehari x 25 hari = RM600 sebulan

Anak perempuan saya bekerja sambilan semasa dia belajar di Universiti….dia bekerja di Gloria Jeans Coffee…Berapa gajinya ?

$14.00 Australia @ 3.15 = RM44 sejam x 8 = RM352 sehari x 25 hari = RM8,800…13.3 kali ganda lebih !!!..Harga rumah-rumah di Perth adalah kira-kira sama dengan di KL. Harga kereta adalah kira-kira 23% lebih rendah di Perth berbanding Malaysia.

Saya merasakan lebih ramai yang semakin menyedari akan corak (bearish) ini.

Negara maju menjelang 2020…..maknanya negara berpendapatan tinggi !!!

Marilah kita renungi tahun 2005 (Financial Times)

USA GNP per kapita US$35,400

UK GNP per kapita US$25,510

Australia GNP per kapita US$19,530

Singapura GNP per kapita US$20,690

Ini adalah ukuran pendapatan negara-negara maju….

Malaysia GNP per kapita US$3,540

Tahun 2020..apakah Malaysia akan mencapai status negara maju? Sebenar-benarnya…ini satu cerita sedih. Corak yang membimbangkan..betul??

Ringgit yang semakin jatuh dan jatuh di bawah kerajaan sekarang.

Baru-baru ini, saya telah menemuduga beberapa graduan baru yang memohon pekerjaan di syarikat kejuruteraan saya. Saya menerima dua pemohon dengan gaji permulaan sebanyak RM1,600. Sungguh pelik saya rasakan bahawa 15 tahun yang lalu saya sebagai graduan baru jurutera juga mula bekerja dengan jumlah bayaran gaji yang sama.

Sesungguhnya, jika anda bandingkan gaji graduan-graduan sekarang dengan 15 tahun mahupun 20 tahun yang lalu, anda akan dapati hanya ada sedikit sahaja perbezaan di antaranya berbanding dengan jurang perbezaan yang besar pada kuasa beli. Cerita yang sama juga jika anda bandingkan gaji pembantu kedai, pekerja pejabat, pekerja kilang, kakitangan kerajaan dan lain-lain lagi.

Tambah memburukkan lagi keadaan ialah kesan inflasi dan nilai ringgit telah menyusut dengan banyak berbanding dengan matawang utama yang lain. Pendapatan sebenar kebanyakan rakyat Malaysia telah menurun.

Inilah sebabnya kenapa ramai rakyat Malaysia yang terkesan dengan kenaikan harga petrol. Masalah asasnya ialah pendapatan sebenar kita telah mengecil dalam menghadapi inflasi dan penyusutan matawang. Rakyat Malaysia bukanlah dimanjakan dengan subsidi tetapi hakikatnya kita tidak dapat keluar dari kemelut pendapatan yang tidak berganjak (bertambah) malah semakin menyusut.

Bandingkan pendapatan per kapita Singapura, Hong Kong, Taiwan dan Korea Selatan, yang beberapa kali ganda lebih dari kita sedangkan semua negara ini adalah di tahap ekonomi yang sama dengan kita semasa merdeka. Kita diletakkan di dalam kumpulan yang sama dengan mereka dan dipanggil Harimau kecil Asia. Hari ini kesemua mereka telah maju ke hadapan dan menjadi Negara Dunia Pertama (OECD) kecuali kita. Sekarang ini jika dibandingkan pula dengan Negara Dunia Kedua seperti Thailand, Indonesia dan Vietnam, nampaknya mereka telahpun memintas kita…!

Apakah silapnya ? Kita dulunya adalah bintang bersinar yang sedang naik, negara yang kaya dengan sumber alam semulajadi dan penuh dengan potensi.

Sebabnya adalah rasuah yang banyak, rompakan terhadap sumber-sumber, pembaziran dana-dana untuk projek-projek besar yang tidak ekonomik, perhubungan dengan syarikat-syarikat yang mempunyai kepentingan politik (krono-kroni) yang bersifat anti-kepentingan awam serta sikap lepas tangan…Sebagai contoh, Hong Kong dan Singapura telah menghapuskan rasuah yang bermaharajalela pada tahun 80an-90an dengan ICAC mereka dan mengamalkan ketelusan dan meritokrasi beserta dengan pendidikan bertaraf dunia untuk menaikkan ekonomi mereka. Mereka kini mempunyai universiti-universiti yang berada pada tahap 50 terbaik di dunia (tiada pada tahun 80an-90an kecuali Universiti Malaya).

NEP selama empat dekad di Malaysia di mana polisi pendidikan, ekonomi dan pekerjaan ditentukan berdasarkan kaum telah menyebabkan meritokrasi diketepikan.

Tahap pencapaian universiti-universiti kita telah menurun dan hari ini golongan muda yang terpelajar telah berhijrah untuk mengelakkan diri dari ketidakseimbangan kaum ini yang akhirnya menyumbang kepada pertumbuhan ekonomi di negara asing.

Reputasi sistem kehakiman kita yang dulunya di pandang tinggi di mata dunia telah menjunam dengan teruk sehinggakan pelabur asing sekarang ini bertegas untuk menggunakan sistem pengadilan di Singapura sekiranya berlaku sebarang pertikaian.

Kita juga mempunyai undang-undang yang berbentuk penindasan seperti ISA, OSA, Akta Universiti Kolej Universiti (AUKU) dan PPPA yang menghalang kenyataan terbuka digubal bertujuan memastikan parti yang memerintah terus berkuasa…

Kita menjadi semakin tidak menarik kepada pelabur asing dan kini ketinggalan di belakang berbanding dengan negara jiran untuk pelaburan asing langsung. Sehinggakan beberapa syarikat yang telahpun bertapak di sini talah mengambil langkah untuk keluar dari Malaysia.

Semua kelesuan ekonomi dan sosial ini telah memberikan kesan kepada nilai matawang kita. Sedangkan pada dasarnya kekuatan nilai matawang mencerminkan kekuatan ekonomi sesebuah negara. Ditambah pula, Bank Negara mempunyai polisi ringgit yang lemah untuk membantu pengekspot-pengekspot, tanpa memikirkan bebanannya kepada rakyat biasa. Kerajaan adalaah pro-syarikat, bukan pro-rakyat.

Sementara golongan miskin dan kelas pertengahan semakin terhimpit, sekumpulan golongan elit pula semakin bertambah kaya. Kita telah dikenali sebagai negara yang mempunyai ketidaksamaan pendapatan yang terburuk di kalangan negara-negara Asean. Pengagihan kekayaan yang sepatutnya kepada golongan miskin dan kelas pertengahan telah pergi kepada beberapa kumpulan berkepentingan politik yang elit dan terpilih.

Kesan akhirnya, pengagihan kekayaan negara lebih kepada sebilangan kumpulan kecil yang sangat kaya sedangkan yang lain terus dihimpit kemiskinan dan golongan kelas pertengahan semakin mengecil. Inilah yang terjadi apabila yang kaya menjadi semakin kaya dan yang miskin menjadi semakin miskin.

Banyak yang tidak kena di Malaysia. Kerajaan yang memerintah bertanggungjawab sepenuhnya kepada negara kita yang semakin ketinggalan. Inilah kesalahan pemerintahan BN , politik perkauman dan budaya pilih kasih telah menyaksikan kemorosotan ekonomi dan sosial negara.

Kita semakin jatuh ke bawah seperti tergelincir di cerun yang licin bagi setiap tahun pemerintahan BN. Lima tahun lagi BN memerintah, kita akan berada di tahap yang sama dengan Indonesia semasa pemerintahan Soeharto. 10 tahun lagi BN memerintah negara kita akan berada di kedudukan negara-negara Afrika. Inikah caranya kita menyambut kedatangan tahun 2020??

Masih adakah harapan untuk Malaysia?

Berhadapan dengan realiti bahawa BN tidak akan berubah, ramai rakyat Malaysia terdesak mahukan perubahan dan telah beralih kepada Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Pakatan Rakyat telah berjanji untuk memberi keadilan kepada semua kaum, menyekat pembaziran, melawan rasuah, membentuk semula sistem kehakiman dan menjadikan Malaysia lebih berdaya saing.

Walau bagaimanapun ada yang mempersoalkan sama ada kita boleh mempercayai Anwar Ibrahim dan gabungan parti-parti komponen Pakatan Rakyat yang dianggap rapuh. Persoalan di sini ialah bukannya sama ada kita boleh mempercayai Anwar dan Pakatan Rakyat tetapi sama ada kita masih boleh bertahan di bawah BN??

Mampukah kita menerima lagi 10 tahun kegagalan pemerintahan BN?

KITA MEMPUNYAI KUASA UNTUK MELAKUKAN SESUATU DALAM PILIHANRAYA KE 13; MASA DEPAN KITA BERADA DI DALAM TANGAN KITA SENDIRI!!!

Sekiranya penulisan ini memberi makna kepada anda, sila edarkannya.

Terima kasih.

Allah Selamatkan dan berkati Malaysia.

(terjemahan)

Paying as a Malaysian

Paying TOLs: are they a burden?

Yes, I think they are. What do I get for paying toll everyday?
Now I have to pay an extra RM50 for each credit card. For what?
Extra GST (goods and services tax). Again, how does that benefit me?

Look at the long list:

I have to pay for security guards because the police are hopeless.
I have to install filters because the water supply is dirty.
I have to watch satellite tv because the government broadcasts crap. I mean REAL crAP !!

Many kids have to go for tuition or to private schools because the government schools are bad.
We have to pay IPPs (independent power providers) because the government cannot provide consistent electricity.

We have to pay Indah Water to clean up the sewers.
We have to pay tax on foreign cars because Mahathir wants to keep his dying local car industry alive. ON top of it APs cost bcoz of his cronies.
Most have to drive because the government cannot provide good public transport.

We have to pay to sustain the government's affirmative action policies.
We have to pay for private health care because the public hospitals are crowded .

All in all, we have to pay a PREMIUM to stay in this country!

1Malaysia Boleh!!!
DAMN!!!!!
But how is it that Opposition State Government in Penang can give her citizens free internet access within one year in Government , while BN Government in power since Independence cannot do it?
WHY ?

Bodoh, bangang atau bahlul ?

When I was in Form One, a class-mate asked me "Engkau ni bodoh ke, bangang ke atau bahlul" ? . That's when I learnt that there are 3 categories of stupidity. I forgot all about it untill this week - when I suddenly remembered that question again. It was triggered by 3 pieces of news, all about spending money on unessential projects, splashed all over newspapers.

News 1
Government's plan to build a new Parliament House in Putrajaya at a cost of RM800 million.

News 2
Cost of building the new palace escalates to RM811 million.

News 3
Minister Datuk Nazri Abd Aziz says "government hasn't got enough money to provide our students with scholarships".

Bodoh, bangang or bahlul? If you spend RM1.6 billion on building a new Parliament House and a new palace, you of course won't have money to provide scholarship for our students. Many have already questioned the need for a new Parliament House. The country already has many palaces, many of them hardly used. So people wonder how does the idea of "rakyat didahulukan" fit in here.

Note

RM1.6 billion can finance the entire university education for at least 40,000 students or be used to build at least 40,000 low-cost houses for the poor rakyat.

So think about this, which category do we fit in : bodoh, bangang or bahlul?

Hello Malaysians, in future, think carefully before you cast your valuable votes because the 50 odd years old corrupted govt believes we are bodoh, bangang or bahlul.

Daripada blog MCOBA

Dato Fauzi Abdul Rahman diundang berceramah di Felda Jengka 9

Peneroka-peneroka Felda Jengka 9,Jengka 8, Jengka 10, Jengka 11, Jengka 12 dan kawasan-kawasan Felda sekitarnya mengundang Dato Fauzi Abdul Rahman, Pengerusi Majlis Pimpinan Parti Keadilan Rakyat Negeri Pahang untuk berceramah di Felda Jengka 9, Bandar Jengka Pahang.

Ahli-ahli UMNO di kawasan rancangan Felda tersebut mahu mendengar dari dekat kenapa dan mengapa Dato Fauzi meninggalkan UMNO dan menyertai Parti Keadilan Rakyat.

Ramai dikalangan ahli-ahli UMNO disekitar rancangan Felda dikawasan berkenaan sedang terhintai-hintai untuk turut keluar dari UMNO kerana mereka tidak tertahan lagi dengan pelbagai manipulasi oleh UMNO/BN dan Felda yang mengenakan kepada mereka pelbagai tekanan sehinggakan mereka terpaksa menanggung hutang yang besar dan pendapatan yang tidak sepadan.

Telah diura-urakan kini bahawa Felda mahu mengenakan syarat baru kepada peneroka-peneroka Felda yang selama ini menanam semula secara bersendirian. Dan tindakan yang bakal dilakukan oleh Felda ini memburukkan lagi hubungan diantara peneroka dan Felda/UMNO.

Peneroka-peneroka dikawasan ini mahu juga mengetahu hujah dari Parti Keadilan Rakyat mengatakan bahawa Felda akan bankrap. Mereka setakat ini mengambil sikap berkecuali dan tidak mahu memihak kepada Felda/UMNO atau kepada PKR. Mereka sudah dengar versi penerangan dari Felda dan mereka mahu dengar daripada Parti Keadilan Rakyat.

Untuk itu mereka mengundang juga Haji Suhaimi Said, Pengerusi Felda Negeri Pahang untuk memberikan hujah dari kacamata Parti Keadilan Rakyat berhubung dengan isu Felda Bankrap.

Turut diundang ke Majlis itu ialah Sdri Felicia Ling, Ketua PKR Cabang Cheras merangkap Anggota Majlis Pimpinan Tertinggi PKR Pusat. Felicia telah terkenal di kawasan ini setelah mengadakan beberapa Majlis Ceramah di kawasan Kuala Krau dan Jerantut khususnya apabila beliau berjaya memukau lebih dari 1000 orang hadirin di Majlis Ceramah anjuran PKR-PAS di Felda Jengka 11.

PKR-PAS Jengka 9 dengan ini mengundang orang ramai ke Majlis Ceramah pada 23hb Julai 2010 jam 9.00 malam di Markaz PAS Felda Jengka 9, Bandar Jengka.

Lawatan Dato Chua Jui Meng Ke Kuala Krau

Dato Chua Jui Meng, Anggota Majlis Pimpinan Pusat Parti Keadilan Rakyat merangkap Pengerusi Majlis Pimpinan Parti Keadilan Rakyat Negeri Johor akan melawat Kuala Krau pada 15hb Julai 2010.

Lawatan Dato Chua Jui Meng

ke Perkampongan Orang Asal

Kg Paya Pelong

15hb Julai 2010

Jam 4.30 Petang

Ikut serta: Felicia Ling,

Anggota Majlis Pimpinan Pusat

merangkap Ketua Parti Keadilan Rakyat

Cabang Cheras

Ceramah oleh Dato Chua Jui Meng

di Bilik Gerakan Parti Keadilan Rakyat

Cabang Kuala Krau

15hb Julai 2010

Jam 9.00 Malam

bersama-sama Dato Fauzi Abdul Rahman,

Pengerusi Majlis Pimpinan Parti Keadilan Rakyat Negeri Pahang

dan Felicia Ling

DATANGLAH BERAMAI-RAMAI

3 hari padat program Srikandi Keadilan Pusat di Kuala Krau

Wanita KEADILAN Kuala Krau bergambar dengan rombongan Srikandi KEADILAN Pusat pada 2hb Julai 2010 di Bilik Gerakan Keadilan Kuala Krau
Farah Afzan Faridi, Timbalan Ketua Srikandi KEADILAN Pusat berucap di Bilik Gerakan KEADILAN K. Krau

Siti Aishah Sh Ismail, Ketua Srikandi KEADILAN Pusat berucap di Bilik Gerakan KEADILAN Kuala Krau pada 2hb Julai 2010

Siti Aishah berucap di Majlis Ceramah 3hb Julai 2010 di rumah Haji Suhaimi Said

Farah Afzan berucap pada 3hb Julai 2010 di rumah Haji Suhaimi Said, Ketua KEADILAN Cabang Kuala Krau

Ginie Lim berucap di rumah Haji Suhaimi Said

Siti Aishah berucap di Kg Paya Mengkuang, Temerloh, pada 3hb Julai 2010

Ginie Lim berucap di Kg Paya Mengkuang

Farah Afzan berucap di Kg Paya Mengkuang

Farah Afzan dan rombongan Srikandi Keadilan Pusat di rumah Haji Suhaimi Said pada 2hb Julai 2010

Siti Aisah memberi taklimat di rumah Haji Suhaimi Said

Wanita Keadilan Raub dan Kuala Krau di Majlis taklimat oleh Srikandi Keadilan Pusat

Siti Aishah (kanan) bergambar bersama Batin Berat anak Dolah (Batin Banting, Selangor), Batin Mat Kuang (Batin Kg Pian) dan Haji Suhaimi Said selepas Majlis Ramah Mesra anjuran KEADILAN Ranting Kg Pian, Kuala Krau pada 4hb Julai 2010

Siti Aishah (kanan) di Kg Pian

Siti Aishah dan Srikandi Keadilan Pusat semasa ditemu-ramah oleh wartawan Siasah

pada 4hb Julai 2010 di Rumah Tajudin Ramli, Taman Temerloh Makmur, Temerloh selepas menjamu selera di rumah Tajudin (Bendahari KEADILAN Cabang Temerloh